Zum Inhalt
Startseite » Blog » Criminal AI’s (Part I)

Criminal AI’s (Part I)

  • von
AI Crime: Risks and Regulation, and Ethical considerations. Hacker using AI

AI Crime: Risks, Regulation (and Ethical Considerations): In the digital age, business transactions zip across the internet at the speed of light, and data is worth more than gold. A new threat looms from the shadowy recesses of the cyberspace. This story takes us into the darker corners of the internet. Here, a criminal hacker named Alex wields the power of artificial intelligence (AI) to execute a sophisticated phishing attack.

Note, this is the first part of the article, please find the second part here: Criminal AI’s (Part II)

The story of PhishNet

Once a respected software developer, Alex had drifted into the murky waters of cybercrime over the years. Driven by a thirst for money and power, he decided to develop an advanced AI capable of crafting and sending phishing emails with unprecedented precision. This AI, affectionately dubbed “PhishNet” by Alex, was trained not only to mimic writing styles but also to analyze the interests and habits of potential victims to launch highly personalized fraud attempts.

The plan was simple yet ingenious. PhishNet would first scour social media, blogs, and forums for potential targets. By harvesting publicly available information, the AI learned the communication patterns, likes, and interests of its prey. It then generated personalized emails that were so convincing that even the most cautious recipients believed them to be genuine.

One day, PhishNet set its sights on the CEO of a renowned company, known for his caution and technical savvy. The AI analyzed his online presence, learning that he was an avid sailor and had recently published a blog post about his latest sailing adventure. With this information, PhishNet crafted an email that appeared to come from a seemingly legitimate sailing magazine, inviting the CEO to write an exclusive article about his sailing experiences. The catch: he was asked to click on a link and log in to submit his article.

Despite his usual caution, the CEO was persuaded by the authenticity of the email and clicked on the link. At that moment, malicious software was installed on his computer, giving Alex access to sensitive company data.

However, Alex’s triumph was short-lived. The company had an advanced security system in place that quickly detected and isolated the unusual data traffic. Cybersecurity experts were able to trace the source of the attack, and Alex was eventually apprehended by the authorities.

Conclusion

This tale serves as a cautionary reminder of the dark possibilities of AI in the hands of criminals. It underscores the importance of remaining vigilant and investing in advanced security systems and cybersecurity education to fend off the ever-growing tide of digital threats.

This article attempts to find answers to the following questions:


What is meant by criminal and unlawful use of AI?

At the outset, it is important to provide a clear definition of what is meant by criminal and unlawful applications of AI. This typically includes activities where AI systems are used for illegal purposes, such as fraud, theft, extortion, or manipulation. An introduction to the various forms of such activities can help to raise awareness and understanding among the target audience.

The criminal use of artificial intelligence encompasses the deliberate harnessing of AI technologies to conduct activities that breach legal statutes. This definition spans a wide array of illicit actions, from cybercrime and financial fraud to personal identity theft and beyond. Criminal actors may exploit AI’s advanced capabilities for analyzing large datasets, mimicking human behavior, or even creating realistic fake digital content to deceive, manipulate, or harm individuals and organizations.

Unlawful applications of AI

Unlawful applications of AI extend beyond direct criminal acts to include scenarios where the deployment of such technology poses significant risks to human safety. This could manifest in various forms, such as autonomous systems operating without sufficient oversight or safeguards, leading to accidents or harm. Additionally, AI systems designed or used in a manner that compromises privacy and data security could also fall under this category, especially when they enable unauthorized surveillance, data breaches, or the exploitation of personal information without consent.

The distinction between criminal and unlawful uses of AI underscores the technology’s potential to impact society negatively when misused. It highlights the importance of ethical considerations, robust legal frameworks, and proactive measures to ensure AI’s development and deployment do not endanger individual rights or public safety.

For further information, please refer to the official website of the Federal Chancellery, which outlines the legislative framework for artificial intelligence: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/themen/europa-aktuell/2023/06/ki-gesetz-parlament-beschliesst-rahmen-fuer-kuenstliche-intelligenz.html


What specific risks and threats arise from the misuse of AI?

It is crucial to identify the specific risks and threats that can arise from the misuse of AI technologies. These include, for example, the development and spread of deepfakes, automated cyberattacks, targeted disinformation campaigns, and the manipulation of financial markets. Presenting concrete examples can be particularly illuminating here.

Concern Levels of AI-Related Crimes

The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) brings with it a spectrum of crime concerns, ranging from high to low, each with unique implications for security and societal well-being. High concern crimes exploit AI’s capabilities for significant harm, such as impersonation and system disruptions, posing immediate and serious threats. Medium and low concern crimes, while less immediately disruptive, still highlight the diverse and evolving challenges that AI-related criminal activity presents to individuals, organizations, and governments alike.

High Concern Crimes:

  • Audio/Visual Impersonation: Utilizing advanced audio or video manipulation to convincingly impersonate individuals, potentially for financial fraud or manipulating public opinion.
  • Driverless Vehicles as Weapons: Autonomous vehicles could be repurposed by terrorists for coordinated attacks without needing human operatives.
  • Tailored Phishing: AI enhances phishing techniques, crafting messages that closely mimic legitimate communications, thus harder to discern.
  • Disruption of AI-Controlled Systems: Targeting critical AI systems across various sectors could lead to chaos, including power outages and financial turmoil.
  • Large-Scale Blackmail: Exploiting AI for extensive data mining and identifying personal vulnerabilities, making blackmail more scalable.
  • AI-Authored Fake News: Generating believable yet false news content to manipulate public perception without direct financial gain.

Medium Concern Crimes:

  • Misuse of Military Robots: Employment of military AI hardware by criminal or terrorist groups, with uncertain risk extents.
  • Snake Oil: Selling fraudulent AI-based services, deceiving organizations; mitigated through education.
  • Data Poisoning: Manipulating machine learning datasets to introduce biases, complicating anomaly and malicious pattern detection.
  • Learning-Based Cyber-Attacks: Utilizing AI for large-scale, precise cyber-attacks, exploiting system vulnerabilities.
  • Autonomous Attack Drones: AI-controlled drones could facilitate remote criminal activities.
  • Online Eviction: Using denial of access to online services for extortion or chaos.
  • Tricking Face Recognition: Employing techniques to fool AI-driven facial recognition systems.
  • Market Bombing: Attempting financial market manipulation through AI, a high-cost and complex endeavor.

Low Concern Crimes:

  • Bias Exploitation: Leveraging inherent biases in AI algorithms.
  • Burglar Bots: Small robots designed for burglaries, thwarted by simple countermeasures.
  • Evading AI Detection: Actions aimed at bypassing AI detection by security services.
  • AI-Authored Fake Reviews: Creating misleading AI-generated reviews to deceive consumers.
  • AI-Assisted Stalking: Using AI to monitor individuals, limited in scale.
  • Forgery: Generating counterfeit digital content, like art or music, with AI.

Potential Security Risks:

Algorithmic Risks: Understanding the Vulnerabilities

  • Overview: Algorithms process inputs to produce outputs, with their patterns potentially manipulated for adverse purposes, such as SEO gaming.
  • Risks: Susceptible to biases, errors, and fraudulent manipulations, highlighting the need for trust-building and risk management in algorithmic systems.

Training Data

  • Concern: AI’s dependency on training data poses a risk, as corrupted data can significantly impair system security. Additionally, data source tampering poses further risks.

Lack of Protective Measures

  • Issue: The evolving nature of cyber threats, especially against AI systems, often outpaces current security measures, emphasizing the need for enhanced protective technologies by manufacturers.

How can businesses and organizations protect themselves?

Lets have a look about practical advice and strategies that businesses and organizations can use to protect themselves against the risks of AI misuse. This includes the implementation of security systems, training employees to recognize and counter AI-based threats, and adhering to best practices regarding data protection and information security.

To safeguard against AI-based threats, organizations may probably adopt the following non-exhaustive, structured set of practical advice:

1. Establish an External AI Ethics Board:

  • Purpose: To embed representation, transparency, and accountability into AI development decisions.
  • Functions: Ensuring responsible AI use, preventing misuse, addressing ethical concerns, guiding best practices, conducting risk assessments, and ensuring compliance with privacy and security standards.

2. Implement Technical Safeguards:

  • Security Measures: Deploy security systems that include data encryption, access controls, and secure APIs.
  • Monitoring and Compliance: Regularly monitor AI algorithms for anomalies, bias, or unintended consequences, and implement robust testing and validation processes.

3. Train Employees and Raise Awareness:

  • Education: Educate employees about AI risks and threats, and provide training on recognizing and defending against AI-based attacks.
  • Culture: Foster a culture of accountability and vigilance, encouraging employees to report any suspicious AI-related activities.

4. Privacy by Design and Data Protection:

  • AI Design: Design AI systems with privacy in mind and conduct Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs) before implementation.
  • Data Management: Regularly assess and update privacy policies to comply with data protection regulations (e.g., GDPR), minimize data collection, anonymize data, and secure sensitive information.

5. Ethical AI Principles and Guidelines:

  • Principles Development: Develop and adhere to internal ethical AI principles covering fairness, transparency, accountability, and bias mitigation.
  • Community Engagement: Involve stakeholders beyond the company, including the public, interest groups, and affected communities, in AI policy and practice discussions.
  • Guideline Adherence: Follow established ethical guidelines (e.g., IEEE Ethically Aligned Design, ACM Code of Ethics).

6. Collaborate and Share Best Practices:

  • Collaboration: Work with other organizations, industry peers, and regulatory bodies to share insights, lessons learned, and best practices for AI risk mitigation.
  • Continuous Learning: Participate in industry forums, conferences, and working groups to stay updated on emerging risks and effective strategies.

By implementing these strategies, organizations can significantly enhance their resilience against AI-based threats, ensuring responsible use and ethical governance of AI technologies.

References:


An overview of the current legal and regulatory frameworks governing the use of AI technologies is essential for understanding the legal obligations and boundaries. This includes discussing potential gaps in legislation and how they could be addressed in the future to more effectively prevent the misuse of AI.

European Union

On June 14, 2023, the European Parliament solidified its stance on the future of artificial intelligence within the European Union by voting in favor of the Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act) with a significant majority. This legislative move marks a pivotal step towards establishing a comprehensive regulatory framework designed to govern the development and application of AI technologies across EU member states. By adopting this act with 499 votes for, 28 against, and 93 abstentions, the European Parliament aims to ensure that AI systems utilized within the EU not only adhere to stringent safety, privacy, and transparency standards but also respect fundamental human rights and values as enshrined in EU law.

The AI Act

The AI Act is groundbreaking, setting out to meticulously categorize AI systems based on the level of risk they present and to apply a corresponding regulatory approach. This includes outright prohibiting certain uses of AI deemed to endanger human safety or to violate personal freedoms, such as indiscriminate surveillance or social scoring systems. Moreover, the legislation emphasizes the necessity for AI applications to be non-discriminatory, to safeguard society and the environment from harm, and to operate within a framework that promotes accountability and ethical usage.

Reference: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/themen/europa-aktuell/2023/06/ki-gesetz-parlament-beschliesst-rahmen-fuer-kuenstliche-intelligenz.html

Austria

In parallel, Austria has taken proactive steps at the national level with the development of the Artificial Intelligence Mission Austria 2030 (AIM AT 2030). This strategy aligns with the broader EU vision, focusing on creating an ecosystem that fosters safe, ethical, and human-centered AI innovation. The AIM AT 2030 strategy outlines the country’s ambitions to lead in responsible AI development, ensuring that advancements in this field contribute positively to society and the economy while addressing potential risks and ethical concerns head-on.

Reference: https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokumente/Mrp/MRP_20210915_70/011_000.pdf

United States

In the United States, significant steps have been taken to create legislation regulating the use of artificial intelligence (AI), marking a proactive approach toward ensuring the technology’s safe, secure, and trustworthy development and use.

Executive Order aimed at leading America in harnessing AI’s promise while managing risks

President Biden issued an Executive Order on October 30, 2023, aimed at leading America in harnessing AI’s promise while managing its risks. This comprehensive strategy includes new standards for AI safety and security, protection of privacy, promotion of equity and civil rights, and advancement of innovation and competition. Over 50 federal agencies have been charged with executing more than 100 specific tasks, and a White House Artificial Intelligence Council has been established to coordinate the implementation​​.

Reference: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/10/30/fact-sheet-president-biden-issues-executive-order-on-safe-secure-and-trustworthy-artificial-intelligence/

Interest of congress in AI governance

Additionally, Congress has shown interest in AI governance through incremental policy-making and legislation. Notable legislative efforts include the National AI Initiative Act of 2020, which focuses on expanding AI research and development and further coordinating AI R&D activities between defense/intelligence communities and civilian federal agencies. The Act also led to the creation of the National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Office, overseeing the U.S. national AI strategy​​.

Reference: https://iapp.org/resources/article/us-federal-ai-governance/

Bills to ensure transparency on governmental use of AI

Moreover, in 2023, U.S. senators introduced two separate bipartisan AI bills. One bill aims to ensure transparency when the U.S. government uses AI to interact with people, requiring agencies to inform individuals when AI is used and to provide a means to appeal AI-made decisions. Another bill proposes establishing an Office of Global Competition Analysis to keep the U.S. competitive in AI technologies​​.

Reference: https://www.reuters.com/technology/us-congress-consider-two-new-bills-artificial-intelligence-2023-06-08/

These developments reflect a growing recognition of AI’s potential benefits and challenges, and a concerted effort by the U.S. government to foster responsible innovation while protecting citizens and maintaining global leadership in AI technologies.

Other countries

The United Kingdom has taken a different approach, emphasizing a less centralized regulation compared to the EU. It introduced an “AI rulebook” outlining six principles for regulators to ensure AI’s responsible development and application across industries, allowing more flexibility and innovation​​.

Globally, the situation varies significantly:

Moreover, initiatives like the Global Partnership on Artificial Intelligence (GPAI), supported by OECD countries, aim to develop AI in accordance with human rights and democratic values. This collaboration involves countries such as Canada, France, Germany, India, Italy, Japan, the UK, and the US, among others, and seeks to foster responsible AI development and use worldwide​​.

Reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulation_of_artificial_intelligence

These efforts reflect a growing consensus on the importance of regulating AI to harness its benefits while mitigating its risks. Each country’s approach to AI legislation and regulation illustrates different priorities and strategies, ranging from promoting innovation and competitiveness to protecting citizens’ rights and safety.


What are the ethical and societal implications?

The ethical and societal implications of the misuse of AI technologies must also be taken into account. This includes consideration of the moral responsibility of developers and users of AI systems, as well as the long-term effects on trust in technology and the integrity of societal and economic systems.

We can discuss the enticed implication of AI technology from two main perspectives: the moral responsibility of those involved in AI development and use, and the long-term consequences of AI misuse on societal trust and integrity. Additionally, it touches upon global initiatives for ethical AI use and the importance of balancing the potential benefits and risks associated with AI technologies. Here’s a structured analysis and reorganization of the key points:

Ethical Responsibilities in AI Development and Use

  • Developers: Tasked with the creation of AI systems, developers have a profound ethical obligation to ensure their technologies positively impact society. This includes considering the effects of AI on individuals and communities and avoiding harm.
  • Users: Those who deploy AI technologies must do so responsibly, particularly in sensitive areas like healthcare and justice. Ethical usage requires understanding the potential outcomes of their applications.

Impact of AI Misuse on Trust and Societal Integrity

  • Trust Erosion: Misuse of AI, such as for creating deceptive content or embedding biases in decision-making processes, can significantly reduce public confidence in technology.
  • Systemic Integrity: The integrity of societal and economic frameworks could be jeopardized by unethical AI applications, potentially reinforcing existing disparities and injustices.

As artificial intelligence (AI) technologies advance, striking a balance between their vast potential and inherent risks becomes imperative. Global efforts led by UNESCO and the corporate sector aim to guide the ethical development and application of AI, ensuring it aligns with the common good and respects key principles such as transparency and privacy.

Global Initiatives for Ethical AI

  • The UNESCO Recommendation emphasizes that AI should contribute to the common good, highlighting the need for ethical development and application across various domains, including education and environmental conservation.
  • The recommendation advocates for adhering to principles like transparency, justice, and privacy in AI, alongside the importance of regular assessments to monitor ethical compliance in AI developments.

Reference: https://www.unesco.at/wissenschaft/wissenschafts-und-bioethik/ethik-der-kuenstlichen-intelligenz/unesco-empfehlung-zur-ethik-der-ki

Balancing AI’s Risks and Opportunities

  • While AI offers substantial benefits for innovation and efficiency, it also poses certain risks. Ethical considerations, particularly concerning privacy and misinformation, are critical in navigating the deployment of generative AI and other advanced technologies.
  • Companies are exploring generative AI tools and other emerging technologies. However, they must navigate ethical concerns related to privacy, misinformation, and unintended consequences.
  • The pathway to responsible AI adoption involves a careful evaluation of its impacts, aiming to ensure technologies are in harmony with societal norms and contribute positively to human welfare.

In conclusion, the ethical considerations surrounding AI misuse are central to achieving a sustainable and equitable technological future. A collaborative effort among developers, users, and policymakers is essential in fostering a responsible AI ecosystem that maximizes benefits while minimizing potential harm.

Reference: https://www2.deloitte.com/de/de/pages/innovation/contents/digitale-ethik-und-vertrauen-in-technologien.html


Summary

AI Crime: Risks, Regulation (and Ethical Considerations)

The article discusses various ways in which AI technology can be misused for criminal activities, ranging from high to low concern crimes. It emphasizes the importance of understanding and addressing the risks associated with AI-based threats. The text highlights the need for ethical considerations, technical safeguards, and regulatory frameworks to mitigate these risks effectively. Additionally, it explores the potential role of AI in crime prevention and law enforcement, as well as the significance of international cooperation and agreements in combating AI-related crimes.

Author: INFORITAS Social Media Team // 2024-03-17